Skip to content

Daniel B.

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Daniel B. commented  · 

    It does, but very badly as it only uses screen mirroring via the Google Home app. So the results are low res and choppy. There's no "cast" functionality directly from the app like programs that have true casting support offer. So, I would imagine for most users the so-called Chromecast support is completely useless.

  2. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Daniel B. commented  · 

    It works with mirroring, but mirroring is much less smooth, and is inherently lower res. It looks, frankly, terrible compared to what it could be with native casting support. And it's a pain to use, requiring you to go deep into the Google App then switch back. Yuch.

    Native Chromecast would be full res, smooth (just like chromecasting netflix) and would be a simple one click from BitGym. They are night and day.

    I won't use mirroring, but I'd definitely use true Chromecasting.

    Please add it!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Daniel B. commented  · 

    Yep. It needs it -- for Android as well. Mirroring from phone (via Android) to Chromecast is low res and jerky. Native Chromecast support would make it perfect.

Feedback and Knowledge Base